Data collection around the 2019 EP elections finished
News flash from the EUROPINIONS project, funded by the European Research Council (ERC), project #647316
We finished our large-scale data collection around the May 2019 European Parliament elections. In our comparative study, funded by an ERC grant and with additional support from the University of Amsterdam, we investigate the nature, origins, and consequences of citizens’ EU attitudes.
We are currently finalizing the data files (survey data and content analyses). This is a major task ensuring proper data sets and detailed documentation.
At the same time, we are working hard on analyses and publications based on our data. Finished papers include:
- van Elsas, E. J., Brosius, A., Marquart, F., & de Vreese, C. H. (2019). How political malpractice affects trust in EU institutions. West European Politics.
We study a real-world political malpractice affair in the European Commission, using a three-wave panel design to investigate how information about the affair influences trust in EU institutions. Our findings demonstrate that citizens obtain knowledge about EU affairs through the media, and use this knowledge in their trust evaluations. In doing so, citizens differentiate between EU and national institutions, with trust in the European Commission affected most. This suggests a sophisticated process and highlights the evaluative nature of political trust.
- Brosius, A., van Elsas, E. J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2019). Bad news, declining trust? Effects of exposure to economic news on trust in the European Union. International Journal of Public Opinion Research.
Evaluations of the economy are often assumed to be at the heart of citizens’ support for political systems, yet we know little about the impact of economic news. This study finds that respondents exposed to more EU economic news lose confidence in the economy and trust in the EU. Yet, while exposure to negative EU economic news negatively affects economic confidence, it has a positive effect on trust in the EU. The opposite is the case for positive coverage.
- Brosius, A., van Elsas, E. J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2019). How media shape political trust: News coverage of immigration and its effects on trust in the European Union. European Union Politics.
In this study, we use a combination of European Social Survey and Media Claims data to investigate the effects of the visibility and valence of immigration and refugee media coverage on political trust in the European Union in 18 countries between 2012 and 2016. Our results show that media coverage of immigration and refugees influences trust in the European Union; however, the effects depend on citizens’ ideological leaning and content characteristics.
- Goldberg, A.C., E.J. van Elsas and C.H. de Vreese (forthcoming). Mismatch? Comparing elite and citizen polarisation on EU issues across four countries. Journal of European Public Policy.
In the context of rising EU politicisation, we examine the extent of a (mis)match between elite- and citizen-level EU polarisation, and to what extent this depends on structural (i.e. severity of crises) and supply side (i.e. availability of parties) dynamics. The results show an overall strong association of party- and citizen-level polarisation of EU attitudes – for both general and policy-specific EU positions. Country-specific patterns can be ascribed to different political competition on the supply side.
- Marquart, F., Brosius, A., & de Vreese, C. H. (2019). United feelings: The mediating role of emotions in social media campaigns on EU attitudes and behavioural intentions. Journal of Political Marketing.
Using an experimental design, we test whether political parties’ (1) positive or negative EU-related (2) emotional or non-emotional political messages influence citizens’ emotions toward the EU, whether these emotions affect politically relevant outcomes, and whether the effects differ for citizens with varying political ideologies. We find that positive emotions in particular affect almost all outcome variables above and beyond experimental condition and individuals’ political orientation.
In addition, we are also working on papers with themes such as
- Goldberg, A.C., E.J. van Elsas and C.H. de Vreese. A paper on the development of possible future EU scenarios, in which we explore public preferences for these scenarios and the underlying reasons for these preferences.
- Goldberg, A.C., E.J. van Elsas and C.H. de Vreese. In connection with potential future EU scenarios, we are interested in the extent to which public preferences vary across countries
- Goldberg, A.C., A. Brosius and C.H. de Vreese. In this study, we analyze the effects of EU news exposure on citizens’ policy responsibility attributions to the EU level by linking survey data with automated media content data
- Goldberg, A.C., J. Lefevere and C.H. de Vreese. We examine the relevance of issue ownership voting in the 2019 EP elections, focusing on the moderating influence of peoples’ attribution of policy responsibility of the respective issue to the national or European level.
- Marquart, F., Goldberg, A. C., & de Vreese, C. H. We assess citizens’ exposure to and engagement with the EP 2019 election campaign and test the extent to which these variables contribute to the likelihood that citizens cast their vote.
- Marquart, F., Brosius, A., & de Vreese, C. H. We present the results of a content analysis of news items from the campaign period for the EP elections 2019 to provide insights into the media coverage’s volume and tone in presenting the EU and the election campaign across different countries
- Hameleers, M., Brosius, A., Marquart, F., Goldberg, A. C., van Elsas, E. J., & de Vreese, C. H. In this study, we conceptualize perceptions of mis- and disinformation as different components of perceived untruthfulness, and our findings suggest that news consumers distinguish critical perspectives on the news media’s performance from distrust in the honesty of media elites
When the EP elections were in full swing, the EUROPINIONS team was carrying out research in 10 EU countries. Our research and results were presented at several events and discussions and it featured in multiple media stories. A few examples:
News flash from the EUROPINIONS project, funded by the European Research Council (ERC), project #647316
In only a few months, electorates across the European Union will have the opportunity to vote in the European Parliament elections. In a large scale, comparative study, funded by an ERC grant and with additional support from the University of Amsterdam, we are investigating the nature, origins and consequences of citizens’ EU attitudes.
The team consists of:
Claes H. de Vreese, Professor of Political Communication and Principal Investigator. He has published more than 150 articles on EU public opinion, media effects, journalism, and electoral behavior. T: @claesdevreese
Franziska Marquart, postdoctoral researcher (PhD Communication Science, University of Vienna, 2015). Her research interests focus on political communication effects, experimental methods, and the impact of visual communication in various mediated contexts. T: @FranziMarquart
Anna Brosius, PhD Candidate in Political Communication. Her research focuses on institutional trust in the European Union and how it is changed by media information. T: @AnnaBrosius
Andreas Goldberg, postdoctoral researcher (PhD Political Science, University of Geneva, 2015). His research interests include political behavior, EU attitudes, campaign effects and survey research. T: @andigole W: andreascgoldberg.com
Erika van Elsas, postdoctoral researcher (PhD Political Science, University of Amsterdam, 2017). Her research interests include EU attitudes, political trust and electoral behavior. T: @erikavanelsas
About the project
EUROPINIONS focuses on the nature and composition of citizens’ EU attitudes. It investigates the causes of these attitudes, their development over time, and their effects. The project is cross-national and comparative. It focuses in particular on the role of the media as a key antecedent of change. Understanding citizens’ attitudes towards the EU is one of the key aspects of understanding contemporary politics. From a scientific point of view, understanding the dynamics and consequences of public opinion change is one of today’s most important challenges.
We collect dynamic and detailed cross-national public opinion data – including flash surveys and panel components – and link these rich data up with media content data, meanwhile offering a comprehensive multidimensional perspective on EU attitudes, which is all well beyond the current state of the art. We expect to offer a new understanding of the causes and consequences of EU attitudes and develop a dynamic model of public opinion change.
We collect survey data, across time, in multiple European countries. This is done using online panel surveys and includes also ‘flash surveys’ administrated by cell phones. This allows for a more timely and dynamic tracking of public opinion while only needing to contact the respondent briefly. This approach will allow us to assess the nature, extent and scope of short term fluctuations in opinions.
This is a novel feature in the study of EU attitudes which have not previously included such dynamic elements in the design.
We analyse the changes in opinion in part as a function of the news and information environment. This is assessed by an analysis of major news sources in the different countries. It allows for investigation of the extent to which opinion fluctuations are a response to changes in the news environment.
Our analysis of EU attitudes is also novel in terms of the measurement of these attitudes. Previous studies have typically focused on limited or imprecise definitions of these attitudes and we aim to develop a more comprehensive overview of the different dimensions of EU attitudes to establish which ones are more, or less, stable over time.
The project is in the middle of the main data collection phase. After initial instrument development, pre- testing, and a pilot survey, data collection is now in full swing in one country (the Netherlands). Data collection commenced in Fall 2018 in Denmark, Germany, Spain and Hungary, and will expand in Spring 2019 to France, Greece, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Sweden.
- Conceptual review, pilot survey, instrument development
- Panel survey up and running in the Netherlands, four waves completed (Wave 1 September 2017, Wave 4 December 2018).
- Data collected from first flash survey (Spring 2018).
- Content analysis (NL) in progress (2018)
- First experiments conducted (2017, 2018)
- Compilation and analysis of an extensive dataset of 17 years of newspaper coverage of the European Union in 15 European Countries (Spring 2018)
- First wave of cross-national extension of survey in Denmark, Germany, Spain and Hungary completed (December 2018/January 2019)
- Content analysis (DE, DK, ES, HU) started (Fall 2018)
- In Spring 2019, data collection will additionally happen in France, Greece, Poland, the Czech Republic, and
Project events, updates, conference participation etc. is communicated via social media (each team member has a Twitter handle). Major milestones are listed via this website.
Project members are frequently featured as speakers in the news or at public events and seminars. The project was also featured in the 2018 edition Gala Evening of Science and Society.
Exemplary key findings
Van Elsas, E. J, Goldberg, A. C., de Vreese, C. H. (2018). EU issue voting and the 2014 European Parliament elections: a dynamic perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.
Using four-wave panel data, we tested whether the effect of EU attitudes on EP vote preferences becomes catalyzed as EP elections draw closer. While differentiating between party groups (pro, anti, mixed) and five EU attitude dimensions, we find that EU issue voting occurs for both anti- and pro-EU parties, but only increases for the latter. Overall, we find surprising stability in the sense that EU attitudes form a consistent part of EP voting motivations even outside EP election times.
Goldberg, A.C., de Vreese, C.H. (2018). The Dynamics of EU attitudes and their effects on Voting. Acta Politica 53(4): 542-568.
In the context of the Dutch Ukraine–European Union Association Agreement referendum, we tested the dynamics of EU attitudes during the campaign and their impact on the referendum vote. Our results show significant campaign- induced changes of EU attitudes. Both strengthening and especially emotional attitudes further play significant roles for the voting decision in the referendum.
Marquart, F., Brosius, A., de Vreese, C. H. (2018). United feelings: The mediating role of emotions in social media campaigns on EU attitudes and behavioural Intentions.
Using an experimental design, we test whether political parties’ 1) positive or negative EU-related 2) emotional or non-emotional political messages influence citizens’ emotions towards the EU, whether these emotions affect politically relevant outcomes, and whether the effects differ for citizens with varying political ideologies, and find that positive emotions in particular affect almost all outcome variables.
Brosius, A., van Elsas, E. J., de Vreese, C. H. (2018). Trust in the European Union. Effects of the Information Environment. European Journal of Communication.
This article focuses on the question whether citizens rely less on cues from national politics for the formation of their political trust in the European Union if EU media coverage changes. Using a combination of Eurobarometer survey data and a media content analysis, we find that changes in the EU media environment can in fact influence the extent to which cue taking takes place.
- Brosius, A. , van Elsas, E. J., de Vreese, C. H. (2018). Trust in the European Union. Effects of the Information Environment. European Journal of Communication. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118810843
- Goldberg, A.C., de Vreese, H. (2018). The Dynamics of EU attitudes and their effects on Voting. Acta Politica 53(4): 542-568.
- van Elsas, J, Goldberg, A. C., de Vreese, C. H. (2018). EU issue voting and the 2014 European Parliament elections: a dynamic perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.
- van Elsas, E.J. (2017). Appealing to the ‘losers’? The electorates of left-wing and right-wing Eurosceptic parties compared, 1989-2014. Electoral Studies 50, 68-79.
The EUROPINIONS project studies the causes and consequences of change in public opinion about the European Union. By investigating the nature and composition of citizens’ EU attitudes, we take a closer look at the origins of these attitudes, their development over time, and their effects on attitudes and behaviours. Our project is cross-national and comparative in nature and focuses in particular on the role of the media as a key antecedent of change.
Public opinion towards European integration and the EU is divided, especially in light of ongoing developments in the Union. From being a consensual topic with stable and broad support, it is now a point of contention with rapidly changing opinions. The future of European integration requires public support, but not enough is known about what drives and affects EU attitudes. Opinions may change due to global developments, national politics, and personal experiences, but also in response to new information from (social) media and interpersonal communication. Therefore, one of the central questions of this project is when, how, for whom, and with what consequences communication affects changes in public opinion on the European Union. To approach this question from an interdisciplinary perspective, the Europinions team consists of researchers from both Communication and Political Science.
We are currently conducting an extensive data collection, including a multi-country panel survey, media content analysis, and multiple experiments. Thus far we have finished three waves of our panel survey in the Netherlands and one flash survey in the spring of 2018. These interviews are complemented by data from an ongoing content analysis in a variety of Dutch media outlets and several experimental studies in the Netherlands and Denmark. At the moment, we are in the process of planning upcoming surveys and content analyses in a variety of additional EU countries. Starting in the fall of 2018, we will collect additional panel and media data in Germany, Spain, Hungary, and Denmark.
We presented our work at several international conferences in the past two years, including the ICA in San Diego and Prague, EPSA in Milan and Vienna, ECPR in Oslo, WAPOR in Barcelona and Marrakesh, and ECREA in Odense and Zurich. In 2018, we co-organized a workshop at the ECPR Joint Sessions in Nicosia on the political consequences of Euroscepticism. Thus far, our work on “The dynamics of changes in EU attitudes and their effects on voting” and “Trust in the European Union. Effects of media visibility and tonality” have been accepted for publication in Acta Politica and European Journal of Communication.